Get the fair value you deserve for your totaled vehicle in Delaware

Delaware regulates first-party automobile total losses through three layered authorities: the Unfair Trade Practices statute at 18 Del. C. § 2304 (the Delaware UCSPA, with no private right of action), the implementing claim-handling regulation at 18 Del. Admin. Code § 902 (Regulation 902 — Prohibited Unfair Claim Settlement Practices, formerly Regulation 26), and the contract-based bad-faith doctrine recognized in Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 653 A.2d 254 (Del. 1995) and Pierce v. International Insurance Co., 671 A.2d 1361 (Del. 1996). Delaware requires adjusters and motor vehicle damage appraisers acting in Delaware to hold a Delaware Insurance Department license. SecondAppraisal Inc supplies market research and valuation analysis a Delaware-licensed appraiser may rely on rather than serving as the appraisal-clause appraiser of record. 18 Del. C. § 2304 — Unfair Insurance Practices. The statute defines acts that constitute unfair claim settlement practices when committed or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice, including: misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions; failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness on claim communications; failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims; refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation; failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time; not attempting in good faith to make prompt, fair, and equitable settlements when liability is reasonably clear; and compelling insureds to litigate. Enforcement is by the Insurance Department. 18 Del. Admin. Code § 902 (formerly Regulation 26) — Prohibited Unfair Claim Settlement Practices. Reg 902 is the standard NAIC-modeled generic UCSPA regulation. It does NOT contain Delaware-specific auto-total-loss settlement subsections (no "two-or-more comparables" rule, no separate "statistically valid source" methodology, no codified itemized-dollar-amount adjustments provision specific to auto valuation, no right-of-recourse subsection). The substantive standards Reg 902 imposes are: - 15-working-day claim acknowledgment; - 10-working-day prompt-investigation duty; - 30-day window to affirm or deny coverage after proof-of-loss completion; - Good-faith settlement duty when liability has become reasonably clear; - Prohibition on compelling insureds to litigate by offering substantially less than a normal fair claims evaluation would give them; - Explanation of the basis for a denial or compromise offer when requested (it may be given verbally, and is then documented in the claims file); - A 4%-of-sampled-claims threshold used by the Department to find a prima facie "general business practice" violation. Reg 902 § 3.5 also expressly disclaims any private right of action: "This regulation shall not create a cause of action for any person or entity, other than the Delaware Insurance Commissioner, against a person or the person's representative based upon a violation of 18 Del.C. §2304(16)." The closed-list auto-valuation methodology that some states have adopted via separate auto-specific regulations was not adopted in Delaware. Auto-total-loss valuation practices in Delaware are accordingly governed by the policy's appraisal clause, the generic UCSPA "good-faith settlement when liability is reasonably clear" duty, and the Tackett/Pierce contract framework — not by a Delaware regulatory mandate of NAIC-model auto subsections. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 653 A.2d 254 (Del. 1995) — Bad-Faith Breach of Contract. The Delaware Supreme Court declined to recognize a separate tort of first-party bad faith but held that an insurer's breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in claim handling is a breach-of-contract claim. Recoverable damages under Tackett are the policy benefit plus foreseeable Hadley v. Baxendale-style consequential damages (including interest on delayed payments), with punitive damages available for sufficiently egregious or malicious conduct. The Tackett opinion expressly held that "in the absence of accompanying physical injury, however, there can be no recovery for emotional distress." Pierce v. International Insurance Co., 671 A.2d 1361 (Del. 1996), reaffirmed Tackett and extended it to third-party-beneficiary claims by injured employees against workers' compensation insurers; Pierce reiterated that "an action for a breach of the covenant of good faith does not normally allow recovery for emotional distress" and that damages for emotional distress do not arise from a breach of the duty of good faith in the workers' compensation context. Pierce allowed punitive damages where the insurer's bad-faith conduct demonstrates "reckless indifference or malice toward the plight of the injured employee." The operative bad-faith standard requires conduct without "reasonable justification" — a deliberate or reckless disregard of the insurer's contractual duties. Salvage Title in Delaware. Delaware does not impose a numeric repair-cost-to-value salvage threshold by statute. The salvage-title transfer procedure lives at 21 Del. C. § 2512 (Transfer for salvage), which describes the insurer's title-handling duties when a total-loss settlement results in transfer of ownership. Delaware in practice uses the Total Loss Formula (repair cost + salvage value ≥ ACV); carrier total-loss decisions are governed by policy language and the insurer's internal economic-impracticality analysis, subject to the good-faith requirements of 18 Del. C. § 2304 and the Tackett/Pierce contract framework. Delaware Adjuster and Appraiser Licensing. Acting as an insurance adjuster or motor vehicle damage appraiser in Delaware requires a Delaware Insurance Department license under Title 18, with continuing-education and good-character requirements. SecondAppraisal Inc is not licensed in Delaware; the policyholder must retain a Delaware-licensed appraiser if invoking the policy's appraisal clause, and our market-research and valuation analysis serves as one of the foundations of that licensed appraiser's independent opinion.

The Delaware Supreme Court declined to recognize a separate tort of first-party bad faith and instead built the doctrine entirely on contract. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 653 A.2d 254 (Del. 1995), held that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every insurance contract supports a breach-of-contract claim when the insurer denies, delays, or underpays a claim without "reasonable justification." Recoverable damages are the policy benefit plus foreseeable consequential damages (including interest on delayed payments), with punitive damages available for sufficiently egregious conduct. Tackett expressly held that "in the absence of accompanying physical injury, however, there can be no recovery for emotional distress." Pierce v. International Insurance Co., 671 A.2d 1361 (Del. 1996), reaffirmed Tackett's contract-based framework, extended it to third-party-beneficiary claims by injured employees against workers' compensation insurers, and reiterated that emotional-distress damages are unavailable absent accompanying physical injury or an independent tort. Pierce allowed punitive damages where the insurer's bad-faith conduct demonstrates "reckless indifference or malice toward the plight of the injured employee." The contract-based framing means Delaware's bad-faith claim is subject to a 3-year statute of limitations (10 Del. C. § 8106) running from the breach.